Washington — A federal judge on Friday rejected the Justice Department's effort to force Rhode Island to turn over sensitive voter information, dealing another blow to the Trump administration's attempts to gain access to state voter registration lists. U.S.
Main Idea: A federal judge rejected the Justice Department’s attempt to force Rhode Island to turn over unredacted voter rolls, saying the request was not allowed by election law.
Key Points:
Federal fights over voter rolls can raise state costs and keep privacy fears high for voters whose personal data is in those records.
The ruling may protect voter privacy and limit possible misuse of sensitive registration data.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Federal judge whose ruling rejecting the Justice Department’s request is the central action in the article.
Central government body that sued Rhode Island and sought access to voter registration data.
State government being sued and defending its voter rolls; the article centers on its refusal to hand over.
The Trump administration’s voter-data effort and his public claims about noncitizen voting are major elements of the story.
Rhode Island official who opposed the demand and is directly involved in the dispute over voter data.
Mentioned as the intended recipient of Rhode Island voter data for database checks, but not the main actor.
One of the states where similar lawsuits were dismissed, serving as supporting context.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentIncluded as another jurisdiction the Justice Department sued in its voter-roll effort.
Mentioned because it approved related legislation, but not a focus of the article.
One of the states where similar lawsuits were dismissed, serving as supporting context.
One of the states where similar lawsuits were dismissed, serving as supporting context.
One of the states where similar lawsuits were dismissed, serving as supporting context.