
A pair of jurists vying to be Wisconsin’s next Supreme Court justice sparred Wednesday night ahead of the first major statewide race in a battleground since the 2024 election. Limited time: Save 25% on NBC News subscription Get exclusive reporting, live Q&As and ad-free reading.
Main Idea: Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Susan Crawford and Brad Schimel clashed over abortion rights and the outsized role of billionaire money, especially Elon Musk’s spending, in the state’s high-stakes race.
Key Points:
The race could shape abortion access, labor rules, and voting maps, affecting patients, workers, and voters in Wisconsin for years.
A closely watched court election can give voters a chance to steer major state rulings and limit outside influence.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
A dominant outside influence in the race, with the article focusing on his spending, endorsements, and potential interests.
The other main Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate; his support from Elon Musk-linked groups and abortion positions are central.
One of the two main Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates; her debate performance, abortion stance, and comments on billionaire.
The state is the jurisdiction at the center of the election, campaign spending, and abortion litigation.
The election is for this court, and its ideological balance and pending abortion case are central to the.
Musk-funded super PAC that has pumped millions into the campaign and is a major spending actor.
Musk-aligned group that has spent heavily to support Brad Schimel and is one of the major spending vehicles.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentNamed party organization receiving major donations and serving as a funding channel for the Crawford campaign.
Major billionaire donor repeatedly cited as a key source of liberal spending in the race.
Central commercial actor because the article connects its Wisconsin lawsuit to possible interests before the state Supreme Court.
Central funding conduit for Crawford and the liberal side of the race, including donations transferred through the party.
Mentioned as a party directly asking the court to establish an abortion right, but not the main focus.