
While Ameen Taylor feels fortunate he has a cooling tree cover in the front and back yards of his Detroit home, he knows it’s a different story for many residents of his hometown where neighborhoods often have little to no shade. “To me, 70 degrees is fair weather, but when you’re walking somewhere or you’re around a neighborhood that don’t have trees, it will feel like it’s like 87, 90 degrees. That’s what it feel like,” said Taylor. “You’re exposed to more sun than you are shade.” Like many cities in the U.S.
Main Idea: President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act set aside $1.5 billion to help cities plant and care for more trees, with a focus on hotter, underserved neighborhoods.
Key Points:
Taxpayers may face criticism over the $1. 5 Billion cost, and some projects may fail if cities cannot maintain new trees.
No clear positive impact identified.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central political figure behind the $1.5 billion urban forestry funding discussed throughout the article.
Major nonprofit whose Tree Equity Score Analyzer is used by cities and towns to target plantings.
Major nonprofit advocate and implementer cited as shaping and supporting urban tree-planting efforts.
Chief executive of the Arbor Day Foundation and a prominent quoted voice on the article’s central theme.
Named governor proposing to use remaining relief funds for tree plantings.
Washington’s commissioner of public lands, quoted on underinvestment in urban tree canopy.
Senior manager at the Arbor Day Foundation quoted to explain tree canopy inequity and pandemic-era concerns.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentNamed senator criticized the Inflation Reduction Act’s tree-planting funding in a political pushback.