
Until last year, the U.S. Agency for International Development was part of a time-tested system for dealing with Ebola. In its absence, a dozen former federal employees told NBC News, the U.S. response to the growing outbreak has been slow and disjointed. Subscribe to read this story ad-free Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content. The Trump administration hollowed out USAID last year, canceling the majority of its programs and firing most of its staffers.
Main Idea: Former USAID officials say the agency’s removal slowed Ebola detection and response in Congo, while the State Department says its new system is still working.
Key Points:
Slower Ebola detection abroad can raise the risk of imported cases, more health costs, and taxpayer spending for US outbreak response.
The State Department says its aid and clinic support may still help contain the outbreak and lower spread risk.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
The outbreak is centered in Congo and the country’s response capacity is a major part of the story.
Central agency whose dismantling and absence are the main subject of the article.
Major aid organization cited as downsizing in Congo because of funding cuts.
Former USAID official whose assessment that speed was lost is a major quoted view.
His administration’s changes to USAID and foreign assistance are central to the article’s argument.
Key international body cited for outbreak numbers and coordination.
Former CDC medical officer quoted on the loss of trained community health workers.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentFormer CDC epidemiologist quoted on international coordination and response limits.
IRC country director quoted on reduced capacity and lack of supplies.
Named official defending the administration’s USAID reforms.