
President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to overhaul the nation’s elections faced its first legal challenges Monday as the Democratic National Committee and a pair of nonprofits filed two separate lawsuits calling it unconstitutional. Limited time: Save 25% on NBC News subscription Get exclusive reporting, live Q&As and ad-free reading. The Campaign Legal Center and the State Democracy Defenders Fund brought the first lawsuit Monday afternoon.
Main Idea: The Democratic National Committee and nonprofit groups sued President Donald Trump over his executive order on elections, saying it is unconstitutional and could make voting harder.
Key Points:
The lawsuits show the order could delay voting rules, raise costs for states, and confuse or block some eligible voters if proof-of-citizenship rules are enforced.
The court fights could stop a disputed order from taking effect and protect easier access to voting for many Americans.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
One of the two main plaintiffs suing over Trump’s election executive order.
Central actor whose executive order is the subject of the lawsuits and the article’s main focus.
One of the lead nonprofit plaintiffs that filed the first lawsuit against the order.
Named plaintiff in the DNC-led lawsuit challenging the executive order.
Government body highlighted in the DNC lawsuit for its role in the order’s data-sharing requirements.
Lead nonprofit plaintiff in the first legal challenge to Trump’s order.
Court where both lawsuits were filed and that is asked to block the executive order.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentOne of the voter advocacy organizations named as allegedly harmed by the order.
Named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, but not individually identified in the article.
One of the voter advocacy organizations named as allegedly harmed by the order.
Named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, but not individually identified in the article.
Federal agency whose authority is discussed as part of the legal challenge to the order.